Examining Formative Assessment Practices in Mathematics in Primary Schools: China and Tanzania Comparative review


  • Ibrahimu Kadau Muslim University of Morogoro, Mogorogo, Tanzania
  • Asha Mussa Mallya Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China




Assessment, Competence-Based Curriculum, Formative Assessment, Mathematics


Evaluation plays an enormous role in the teaching and learning process. Being aware of this, both China and Tanzania use formative assessment to meet the requirements of competence-based curricula especially in mathematics at primary school level. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to look into the formative assessment practices, nature, challenges in mathematics used by Chinese and Tanzanian primary schools. This report used documentary analysis to consult articles, dissertations, and books found in different electronic journals such as ERIC and Science Direct and deem them to have suitable information for the study. The report found that evaluation methods such as test, assignments, homework, and projects are common in both countries. Moreover, some dissimilar is some form of assessment including terminal test and monthly test which are common in Tanzania. Furthermore, bustling classes, heavy teaching loads, and a lack of clarity on the formative assessment implementation strategies have similarly contributed to the ineffective formative assessment in both countries. Further, the researcher recommends the recruitment of mathematics teachers and the provision of in-service and pre-service training to the teachers to reduce ineffectiveness in the implementation of formative assessment in Chinese and Tanzanian primary schools.


Assessment, W. I. F. TEAL Center Fact Sheet No. 9: Formative Assessment.‎

Aydeniz, M. (2009). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. School ‎Science and Mathematics, 109(7), 428-431.‎

Bell, B., Bell, N., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education (Vol. 12). ‎Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.‎

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in ‎education, 5(1), 7-74.‎

Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of ‎educational research, 58(4), 438-481.‎

Ghaicha, A. (2016). Theoretical Framework for Educational Assessment: A Synoptic ‎Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 212-231.‎

Hattie, J. & Jaeger, R. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning: a deductive ‎approach, Assessment in Education, 5, pp. 111–122.‎

Hattie, J., & Temperley, H. (2007). The power of feed-back. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.‎

Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do?. Phi Delta ‎Kappan, 89(2), 140-145.‎

Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless ‎process in formative assessment?. Educational measurement: issues and practice, 28(3), 24-31.‎

Hu, Z. (2019). Chinese Mathematics Teaching Reform Based on the Guidance of Core Literacy. Creative Education, 10(13), 3410-3419.‎

Kahembe, J., & Jackson, L. (2020). Educational assessment in Tanzania: A sociocultural ‎perspective. Springer Nature.‎

Kitta, S., & Tilya, F. (2010). The status of learner-centred learning and assessment in Tanzania in ‎the context of the competence-based curriculum. Papers in Education and Development, (29), ‎‎77-91.‎

Kyaruzi, F., Strijbos, J. W., Ufer, S., & Brown, G. T. (2018). Teacher AfL perceptions and ‎feedback practices in mathematics education among secondary schools in Tanzania. Studies in ‎Educational Evaluation, 59, 1-9.‎

Mosha, J H. (2012). Triennale On Education And Training In Africa –A Case Study Of Learning Materials Used To Deliver Knowledge And Skills– Or Competency–Based Curricula (In Tanzania). Ouagadougou, Burkinafaso : Association For The Development Of Education In Africa ( ADEA ).

Ramprasad, A. (1983) On the definition of feedback, Behavioral Science, 28, pp. 4–‎‎13.‎

Sawyer, R. J., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy ‎instruction, ‎and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on ‎ the composition skills and ‎self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. ‎Journal of educational psychology, 84(3), ‎‎340.‎

Shepard, L. A. (2005). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. ETS Invitational Conference 2005. ‎The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning, New York.‎

TIE [Tanzania Institute of Education]. (2005). Curriculum for ordinary-level ‎secondary education ‎curriculum. Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Institute of ‎Education. ‎

Zhao, X., den Heuvel-Panhuizen, V., & Veldhuis, M. (2016). Teachers’ use of classroom ‎assessment techniques in primary mathematics education—an explorative study with six Chinese ‎teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-18.‎

Zhao, X., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Veldhuis, M. (2017, February). Using classroom ‎assessment techniques in Chinese primary schools: Effects on student achievement. In CERME ‎‎10.‎




How to Cite

Kadau, I., & Mallya, A. M. (2023). Examining Formative Assessment Practices in Mathematics in Primary Schools: China and Tanzania Comparative review. APLIKATIF: Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.59110/aplikatif.v2i1.222
| Abstract views: 83 / PDF downloads: 52