Strengthening Physics Scientific Literacy in the Millennial Generation through the Blended Learning Model

Authors

  • Nurul Amalia Aris STKIP Darud Da’wah wal Irsyad Pinrang, Pinrang, Indonesia
  • Nurhandayani Nurhandayani STKIP Darud Da’wah wal Irsyad Pinrang, Pinrang, Indonesia
  • Nurvadillah Angraini STKIP Darud Da’wah wal Irsyad Pinrang, Pinrang, Indonesia
  • Sitti Rahmayani STKIP Darud Da’wah wal Irsyad Pinrang, Pinrang, Indonesia
  • Mawardi Jalil Masri STKIP Darud Da’wah wal Irsyad Pinrang, Pinrang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59110/aplikatif.v4i2.662

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Conventional Learning, Millennial Students, Physics Education, Scientific Literacy

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the improvement of scientific literacy in millennial students during physics learning through the implementation of the blended learning model. A quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group was used. The experimental class applied the blended learning model, while the control class used conventional learning methods. Data were collected through scientific literacy tests administered as pretests and posttests, which were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and t-tests to examine the significance of differences between the two groups. The results indicate a significant difference in posttest scientific literacy scores between the experimental and control classes. The average posttest score in the experimental class was higher than that of the control class, suggesting that the blended learning model was more effective in enhancing students' scientific literacy. The t-test yielded a t-count of 2.053, which was greater than the t-table value of 1.996, with a significance level of 0.05. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the blended learning model is more effective in improving the scientific literacy of millennial students, particularly in physics education. Future research could explore further optimization of blended learning implementation to enhance various aspects of scientific literacy.

References

Akıllı, M., & Kutur, K. (2023). Does science literacy affect self-efficacy in science teaching? An analysis with structural equation modelling. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 15(2), 487-502. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.2/745

Al-Benna, S., Al-Ajam, Y., Way, B., & Steinstraesser, L. (2010). Descriptive and inferential statistical methods used in burns research. Burns, 36(3), 343-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2009.04.030

Arlim, M., Afrizon, R., Hufri, H., Dewi, W. S., & Sundari, P. D. (2023). Need analysis of interactive multimedia based on scientific literacy in physics learning. Physics Learning and Education, 1(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v1i2.36

Aswirna, P., Kiswanda, V., Nurhasnah, N., & Fahmi, R. (2022). Implementation of STEM e-module with SDGs principle to improve science literacy and environment-friendly attitudes in terms of gender. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 7(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v7i1.16599

Aurini, J., & Davies, S. (2021). COVID‐19 school closures and educational achievement gaps in Canada: Lessons from Ontario summer learning research. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 58(2), 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12334

Basri, H. (2024). The effectiveness of blended learning, digital literacy programs, and teacher training on student outcomes in 2024. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(8), 1745–1752. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i8.249

Boma, M., Mahmudah, R. S. N. A., Salam, S., Pratiwi, I., Syahrir, S., Chen, D., ... & Ariatami, R. N. (2024). Improving science literacy skills through interactive physics e-learning for students at Lapandewa High School. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.10107

Cahyani, C. P. N., & Setiawan, E. P. (2024). How motivation mediated science achievement of Indonesian students: A path analysis on PISA 2018 data. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(12), 10493-10501. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.10012

Chama, D., Ramchurn, S., & Mulaji, S. (2021). M-learning in higher education: Technology ownership and common attributes among millennials in South Africa. M-Learning, ICEDUTECH2021, 202102L001. https://doi.org/10.33965/ml_icedutech2021_202102l001

Di Pietro, G. (2023). The impact of Covid-19 on student achievement: Evidence from a recent meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 39, 100530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100530

Harris, R. (2016). Descriptive and inferential statistics. In Descriptive and Inferential Statistics (pp. 75-95). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920446.n5

Hui, E. G. M. (2019). Inferential statistics and regressions. In Learn R for Applied Statistics. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-4200-1_6

Kade, A., Syarif, M., & Syukur, S. A. (2019). Pengaruh model blended learning terhadap literasi sains dan hasil belajar. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online, 7(3), 5155. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/EPFT/article/view/14586

Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the potential impact of COVID-19 school closures on academic achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549-565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20965918

Lestari, H. (2020). Literasi sains siswa melalui penerapan model pembelajaran blended learning dengan blog. NATURALISTIC: Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2b), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v4i2b.769

Melinda, V., Hariyono, E., Erman, E., & Prahani, B. K. (2021, November). Profile of students’ scientific literacy in physics learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2110(1), 012031. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2110/1/012031

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2022 Tentang Standar Proses Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. https://guru.kemdikbud.go.id/dokumen/WZ20mLN9Ad?parentCategory=Implementasi%20Kurikulum%20Nasional

Putri, N. H. D., & Ramli. (2023). Development of STEM-based physics e-LKS to improve students' scientific literacy abilities. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(2), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.24036/jppf.v9i2.123690

Rusdinal, R., & Afriansyah, H. (2023). A look at IR 4.0 in education. EAI. 12-11-2022.2327378. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-11-2022.2327378

Sartika, D., Nurlina, Mutmainna, Aris, N. A., & Musliana. (2023). The scientific literacy profile of senior high school students based on science competence dimension. In The 1st International Conference on Science Education and Sciences, 2619(1), 100013. AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0122563

Sekiyama, T. (2020). The impact of the fourth industrial revolution on student mobility from the perspective of education economics. Creative Education, 11(04), 435-446. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.114031

Şentürk, C. (2020). Effects of the blended learning model on preservice teachers’ academic achievements and twenty-first century skills. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10340-y

Sharon, A., & Baram‐Tsabari, A. (2020). Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life? Science Education, 104(5), 873-894. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21581

Soroya, S., & Ameen, K. (2020). Millennials’ reading behavior in the digital age: A case study of Pakistani university students. Journal of Library Administration, 60, 559 - 577. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1760563

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukarno, S., & El Widdah, M. (2020). The effect of students’ metacognition and digital literacy in virtual lectures during the COVID-19 pandemic on achievement in the “methods and strategies on physics learning” course. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 477-488. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.25332

Sutrisna, N., & Anhar, A. (2020, August). An analysis of student’s scientific literacy skills of senior high school in Sungai Penuh City based on scientific competence and level of science literacy questions. In International Conference on Biology, Sciences and Education (ICoBioSE 2019) (pp. 149-156). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.200807.032

Uğraş, M., Zengin, E., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2023). Early childhood learning losses during COVID-19: Systematic review. Sustainability, 15(7), 6199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076199

Yu, Z. (2022). Sustaining student roles, digital literacy, learning achievements, and motivation in online learning environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(8), 4388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084388

Yuningsih, W., Permanasari, A., & Permana, I. (2022). Multimedia development of science learning based on science literacy on the theme of lightning. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 4(2), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.33751/jsep.v3i2.1722

Downloads

Published

28-06-2025

How to Cite

Amalia Aris, N., Nurhandayani, N., Angraini, N., Rahmayani, S., & Masri, M. J. (2025). Strengthening Physics Scientific Literacy in the Millennial Generation through the Blended Learning Model. APLIKATIF: Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.59110/aplikatif.v4i2.662

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.