Principles and Applications of Generative and Cognitive Grammar: A Systematic Literature Riview

Authors

  • Aura Syalshabillah Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Destina Kasriyati Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
  • Refika Andriani Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59110/edutrend.462

Keywords:

Applications, Generative Grammar, Principles, Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

Abstract

This study investigates the principles and applications of generative and cognitive grammar, focusing on their influence on language acquisition, literacy development, and second language learning. Spanning from 2020 to 2024, Databases such as Google Scholar and Crossref were used for the initial search, utilizing tools like Zotero and Publish or Perish. Keywords such as "generative grammar," "cognitive grammar," "applications," and "principles" An initial 1,200 articles were identified across Crossref and Google Scholar were employed. After applying rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, including the removal of duplicates and non-English articles, 35 articles were selected for in-depth analysis. Key findings highlight the positive impact of generative and cognitive grammar principles on engagement and outcomes in language learning, particularly for young and second language learners. Systematic and explicit instruction in these grammatical frameworks significantly improves syntactic and semantic skills. However, the review underscores the need for more empirical studies to establish standardized methodologies and assess long-term effects. The implications for practice, particularly in curriculum design and educational policy, are significant. Educators should integrate systematic instruction in generative and cognitive grammar into language learning programs, especially for young and second language learners. While grammatical skills are crucial for language development, instructional methods must be standardized to achieve lasting improvements. Additionally, the research indicates that early grammatical processing is a significant predictor of later language proficiency, emphasizing the need for early intervention and consistent instructional methods. Future research should continue exploring the most effective methods for teaching generative and cognitive grammar in diverse linguistic contexts, ensuring that all learners have the opportunity to develop strong language skills. This comprehensive understanding will aid in crafting educational policies and curricula that support robust language development across various learning environments.

References

Anthonissen, L., & Petré, P. (2019). Grammaticalization and the linguistic individual: New avenues in lifespan research. Linguistics Vanguard, 5(s2), 20180037. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0037

Ausensi, J. (2023). The division of labor between grammar and the lexicon: An exploration of the syntax and semantics of verbal roots (Vol. 150). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Ausensi, J. (2023). The division of labor between grammar and the lexicon: An exploration of the syntax and semantics of verbal roots (Vol. 150). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Cassella, A. (2022). A cognitive view of the cosmos and the universal grammar. Int'l J. Soc. Sci. Stud., 10, 91. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijss.v10i3.5532

Çelikpazu, E. E., & Atalay, E. (2021). The determination of Turkish and Turkish language and literature teacher candidates' awareness of learning grammar. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 842-868. https://search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316/informit.216285862801503

Chomsky, N. (2023). Genuine explanation and the strong minimalist thesis. Cognitive Semantics, 8(3), 347-365. https://brill.com/view/journals/cose/8/3/article-p347_002.xml?ebody=pdf-130820

Davidse, K., & Breban, T. (2019). A cognitive-functional approach to the order of adjectives in the English noun phrase. Linguistics, 57(2), 327-371. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0003

Do Rosario Benros, D. (2023). A multilingual grammar for'The International Style', and its hybrid grammar. In SIGraDi 2022: 26th International Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics (Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 323-334). Editorial UPC. https://doi.org/10.5151/sigradi2022-sigradi2022_16

Ghazali, S., & Sutawijaya, A. (2000). Pemerolehan dan Pengajaran Bahasa Kedua. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependudukan.

Grygiel, M. (2020). The Cognitive Motivation Behind The Semantics Of Hungarian Co-Verbial Constructions With Ossze And Szet. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 61(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2020-0002

Hilpert, M. (2021). Constructional Change and Distributional Semantics. In Ten Lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 248-269). Brill.

Hulstijn, J. H. (2019). An individual‐differences framework for comparing nonnative with native speakers: Perspectives from BLC theory. Language Learning, 69, 157-183.

Königseder, C. (2015). Use of Transition Graphs in Computational Design Synthesis: A Case Study on the 8-Tile Puzzle. ICED 2015. Engineering Design and Computing Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Department for Manufacturing and Process Engineering, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2016.5

Kowalewski, H. (2022). Three cognitive frameworks for analyzing metaphoric plant names: Cognitive Grammar, Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Conceptual Blending Theory. Etnolingwistyka. Problemy Języka i Kultury, 34(34), 79-94. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1122073

Leivada, E., & Westergaard, M. (2020). Acceptable ungrammatical sentences, unacceptable grammatical sentences, and the role of the cognitive parser. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00364

Liu, F. (2023). Book Review: James R Martin, Beatriz Quiroz and Giacomo Figueredo (eds), Interpersonal Grammar: Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description.

Lymar, M. (2021). English abbreviations and acronyms in the socio-political discourse: Types and approaches in translation. Вчені записки ТНУ імені ВІ Вернадського. Серія «Філологія. Журналістика, 32(71), 256-260. https://doi.org/10.32838/2710-4656/2021.5-1/44

Masruddin, M., & Nasriandi, N. (2022). Lexical and Syntactical Errors Performed by Junior High School Student in Writing Descriptive Text. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 1094-1100.

Mastronarde, D. J. (2020). A New Greek Grammar for Students and Teachers: Review of The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Mnemosyne, 73(3), 510-525. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.3024

Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategies Implementation on Students' Reading Comprehension Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847-862. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1249107.pdf

Nesa, N., Sari, P., & Jusriati, J. (2023). Application of the'English Grammar'Application in improving student Grammar. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 11(2), 984-992. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i2.3717

Newmeyer, F. J. (2021). Complexity and relative complexity in generative grammar. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 614352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.614352

Ng, C. W. (2023). Teaching the English Tense System through Systemic Theoretical Instruction and Cognitive Grammar: Investigating Students’ Perceptions. Dilbilim, (40), 61-88. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2023.1315502

Rundquist, E. (2020). The cognitive grammar of drunkenness: Consciousness representation in Under the Volcano. Language and Literature, 29(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394702090862

Salim, M., Al Deen, B. S., & Masoud, M. (2022). The Theory of Government in Arabic Grammatical Traditions: Chomskyan Generative Grammar Perspective. SMART MOVES JOURNAL IJELLH, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v10i5.11307

Stolz, T., & Nintemann, J. (2023). Special Onymic Grammar in Typological Perspective: Cross-Linguistic Data, Recurrent Patterns, Functional Explanations (Vol. 34). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Zuberbühler, K. (2022). Event parsing and the origins of grammar. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 13(3), e1587. https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wcs.1587

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Syalshabillah, A., Kasriyati, D. ., & Andriani, R. (2024). Principles and Applications of Generative and Cognitive Grammar: A Systematic Literature Riview. EDUTREND: Journal of Emerging Issues and Trends in Education, 1(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.59110/edutrend.462

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.