Document-Based Assessment of Item-Writing Skills: Implications for Policy Formulation in Teacher Education

Authors

  • Abraham Gyamfi Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development , Kumasi, Ghana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3189-1825
  • Abraham Yeboah Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development , Kumasi, Ghana
  • Eric Atta Quainoo Wesley College of Education, Kumasi, Ghana
  • Rosemary Acquaye Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6876-8038

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59110/edutrend.881

Keywords:

Assessment quality, College of Education teachers, Item-writing principles, Multiple-choice item construction, Teacher education policy

Abstract

Multiple-choice (MC) items are widely used in teacher education because they are efficient, objective, and suitable for assessing large groups of students. However, poorly constructed MC items may undermine the validity and reliability of assessment results. This study examined the extent to which College of Education teachers adhere to established principles of MC item construction and evaluated the quality of the items they develop and administer. A quantitative document analysis design was employed. Using simple random and stratified sampling procedures, 120 assessment instruments were selected from three Colleges of Education affiliated with Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. Only Section A of each instrument, consisting of 20 MC items, was analyzed, yielding 2,400 items. Four assessment experts evaluated the items against 21 established principles of MC item construction, and the data were analyzed using frequencies and percentages. The findings showed that only two of the 21 principles, representing 9.52%, reached the excellent adherence category. In addition, only 3.58% of the 2,400 items met all criteria for high-quality MC items, indicating that most items contained construction flaws. These findings suggest that weaknesses in MC item construction may threaten the validity, reliability, and fairness of assessment outcomes. The study contributes empirical evidence on actual item-writing practices among College of Education teachers and highlights the need for strengthened item moderation, assessment literacy training, and continuous professional development policies in teacher education institutions.

References

Abdulghani, H. M., Ahmad, F., Irshad, M., Khalil, M. S., Al-Shaikh, G. K., Syed, S., Aldrees, A. A., Alrowais, N., & Haque, S. (2015). Faculty development programs improve the quality of multiple choice questions items’ writing. Scientific Reports, 5, Article 9556. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09556

Adamu, G. G., Dawha, J. M., & Kamar, T. S. (2015). A scheme for assessing technical teachers’ competencies in constructing assessment instruments in technical colleges in Gombe State. ATBU Journal of Science, Technology & Education, 3(2), 1–8.

Afemikhe, O. A., & Imobekhai, S. Y. (2016). Nigerian teachers’ utilization of test construction procedures for validity improvement of achievement tests [Unpublished paper]. Institute of Education, University of Benin.

Agu, N. N., Onyekuba, C., & Anyichie, A. C. (2013). Measuring teachers’ competencies in constructing classroom-based tests in Nigerian secondary schools: Need for a test construction skill inventory. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(8), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR12.219

Amedahe, F. K. (2014). Test construction practices in secondary schools in the Central Region of Ghana. The Oguaa Educator, 2, 52–63.

Amedahe, F. K., & Asamoah-Gyimah, K. (2016). Introduction to measurement and evaluation (7th ed.). Hampton Press.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Anhwere, Y. M. (2009). Assessment practices of teacher training college tutors in Ghana [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Cape Coast.

Ankomah, F. (2020). Predictors of adherence to test construction principles: The case of senior high school teachers in Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Cape Coast.

Armah, C. (2018). Test construction and administration practices among lecturers and staff of examinations unit of the University of Cape Coast in Ghana [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Cape Coast.

Ary, D., Jacobs, C. L., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research methods in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth.

Asamoah-Gyimah, K., & Anane, E. (2018). Assessment in schools [Unpublished mimeograph]. University of Cape Coast.

Awofala, A. O. A., & Babatunde, V. F. T. (2013). Examining attitude towards continuous assessment practices among Nigerian pre-service STM teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(13), 37–49.

Baidoo-Anu, D. (2022). Between-school streaming: Unpacking the experiences of secondary school teachers and students in category C schools in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, Article 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100188

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ennu Baidoo, I. (2024). Performance-based accountability: Exploring Ghanaian teachers’ perception of the influence of large-scale testing on teaching and learning. Education Inquiry, 15(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2022.2110673

Baidoo-Anu, D., Asamoah, D., Quainoo, E. A., Gyamerah, K., Amoateng, E. Y., & Sasu, E. O. (2023). Emergency remote assessment practices in higher education in sub-Saharan Africa during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1221115. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1221115

Brennan, R. L. (Ed.). (2006). Educational measurement (4th ed.). American Council on Education/Praeger.

Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x

Cohen, A. S., & Wollack, J. A. (2006). Test administration, security, scoring, and reporting. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 355–386). American Council on Education/Praeger.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Cengage Learning.

DiBattista, D., & Kurzawa, L. (2011). Examination of the quality of multiple-choice items on classroom tests. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2011.2.4

Downing, S. M. (2005). The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: The consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 10(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-004-4019-5

Erzoah, K. K., Gyamfi, A., Yeboah, A., & Langee, P. (2022). Teachers’ knowledge and practices of classroom assessment in the Ellembelle District of Ghana. Advances in Research, 23(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/air/2022/v23i430337

Gyamfi, A. (2022). Application of classical test theory to the validation of teacher-made mathematics multiple-choice test items. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 16(11), 1–12.

Gyamfi, A. (2023). Differential item functioning of performance-based assessment in mathematics for senior high schools. Jurnal Evaluasi dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 20–34.

Gyamfi, A., & Acquaye, R. (2023). Parameters and models of item response theory (IRT): A review of literature. Acta Educationis Generalis, 13(3), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2023-0022

Gyamfi, A., Loganathan, S., & Acquaye, R. (2023). Improving teachers’ classroom assessment practices: Perceptions of teachers in the Ellembelle District of Ghana. e-mentor, 4(101), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.15219/em101.1625

Gyamfi, A., & Yeboah, A. (2022). The changing phase of validity: The past and now. Global Scientific Journals, 10(6), 1016–1023.

Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(3), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1503_5

Hamafyelto, R. S., Hamman-Tukur, A., & Hamafyelto, S. S. (2015). Assessing teacher competence in test construction and content validity of teacher-made examination questions in commerce in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Education, 5(5), 123–128.

Kissi, P., Baidoo-Anu, D., Anane, E., & Annan-Brew, R. K. (2023). Teachers’ test construction competencies in examination-oriented educational system: Exploring teachers’ multiple-choice test construction competence. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1154592. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1154592

Lambert, D., & Lines, D. (2000). Understanding assessment: Purposes, perceptions, practice. RoutledgeFalmer.

Magno, C. (2013). Standards of teacher competence on student assessment in the Philippines. The Assessment Handbook, 10, 42–53.

Malone, M. E. (2013). The essentials of assessment literacy: Contrasts between testers and users. Language Testing, 30(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480129

Marmah, A. A., & Impraim, A. K. (2013). University lecturer’s competence in the construction of multiple-choice test items: A case study of Coltek Kumasi. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 1(4), 1–9.

Ministry of Education, Ghana. (2017). National teachers’ standards for Ghana: Guidelines. Ministry of Education.

Nitko, A. J. (2012). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Oduro-Kyireh, G. (2008). Testing practices of senior secondary school teachers in the Ashanti Region of Ghana [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Cape Coast.

Quansah, F., & Amoako, I. (2018). Attitude of senior high school teachers toward test construction: Developing and validating a standardised instrument. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 25–30.

Quansah, F., Amoako, I., & Ankomah, F. (2019). Teachers’ test construction skills in senior high schools in Ghana: Document analysis. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.481164

Scully, D. (2017). Constructing multiple-choice items to measure higher-order thinking. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 22(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.7275/swgt-rj52

Shukla, S. (2014). Teaching competency, professional commitment and job satisfaction: A study of primary school teachers. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 4(3), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04324464

Tarrant, M., Knierim, A., Hayes, S. K., & Ware, J. (2006). The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments. Nurse Education Today, 26(8), 662–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.006

Wiredu, S. G. (2013). Assessment practices of tutors in the nurses’ training colleges in the Western and Central regions of Ghana [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Cape Coast.

Yeboah, A., Gyamfi, A., & Sam, N. I. (2019). Relevance of assessment course: A follow-up study of graduate teachers in Ghana. Academia Journal of Educational Research, 9(9), 302–310.

Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers’ self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1604_4

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Gyamfi, A., Yeboah, A., Atta Quainoo, E., & Acquaye, R. (2026). Document-Based Assessment of Item-Writing Skills: Implications for Policy Formulation in Teacher Education. EDUTREND: Journal of Emerging Issues and Trends in Education, 3(2), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.59110/edutrend.881

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.