Women’s Citizenship Practices and Social Power Dynamics in Blitar Regency’s Community Development Programs

Authors

  • Yudi Krisno Wicaksono UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Tulungagung, Indonesia
  • Luluk Atirotu Zahroh UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Tulungagung, Indonesia
  • Tengku Izzati Nabihah Kolej FELCRA, Bandar Baru, Malaysia
  • Asrul Raman Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Pelopor Bangsa, Depok, Indonesia
  • Alfiatuz Zahro Al Istiqlaliyah Universitas Megarezky, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59110/aplikatif.v4i3.653

Keywords:

Citizenship Practices, Desa Berseri, Women, KOTAKU Program, Social Power

Abstract

This study explores women's citizenship practices and their role in shaping social power dynamics within community-based development programs in Blitar Regency, East Java. Focusing on the KOTAKU (City Without Slums) and Desa/Kelurahan Berseri (Radiant Village) programs, the research examines how women contribute to inclusive and sustainable development through active participation in both planning and implementation stages. Using a qualitative case study approach, data was gathered through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis. Findings indicate that women participated in the rembug (community consultation) stage, voicing needs and shaping development priorities. This early engagement enabled more inclusive and representative decision-making. During program implementation, women provided vital logistical support, such as preparing meals and refreshments for workers, demonstrating care, ownership, and solidarity. These roles, though often perceived as informal, were integral to program success and reflect meaningful expressions of civic agency. The study argues that recognizing women’s contributions—both strategic and supportive—is essential to redistributing social power and fostering gender equity. By highlighting women’s active citizenship, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of how gender-inclusive development initiatives can transform community structures and promote more equitable and democratic outcomes.

References

Abdurrahman, A., & Tusianti, E. (2021). Apakah pemberdayaan perempuan dalam ekonomi dan politik telah meningkatkan IPM perempuan Indonesia? Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.v21i2.1319

Alkhaled, S. (2021). Women’s entrepreneurship in Saudi Arabia: Feminist solidarity and political activism in disguise? Gender, Work & Organization, 28(3), 950–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12626

Arib, Y. (2021). The influential factors in women's participation in the labor market of Herat City. International Journal of Advanced Academic Studies, 3(3), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.33545/27068919.2021.v3.i3b.585

Askot Mandiri Kabupaten Blitar. (2021). Lesson learned KOTAKU Kabupaten Blitar.

Atwell, P., & Nathan, N. (2021). Channels for influence or maps of behavior? A field experiment on social networks and cooperation. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12586

Azahari, D., Ratri, S., & Amalia, R. (2024). Mainstreaming gender role in oil palm villages in achieving SDGs. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1308(1), 012064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1308/1/012064

Baye, K., Laillou, A., & Chitekwe, S. (2021). Empowering women can improve child dietary diversity in Ethiopia. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 20(S5). https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13285

Carrasco, S., Ochiai, C., & Tang, L. (2024). Social capital and community resilience in the wake of disasters, conflicts and displacements. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 105049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105049

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Denzin, N. K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 8–16.

Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494

Hassan, O., Sobaih, A. E. E., & Elshaer, I. A. (2022). The impact of women’s empowerment on their entrepreneurship intention in the Saudi food industry. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12), 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120571

Hejwosz-Gromkowska, D., & Hildebrandt-Wypych, D. (2023). Underrepresented and excluded from the public sphere: Women of Solidarity in Polish history textbooks. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych, 42, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.12775/pbe.2023.013

Jrasat, S., & Zubaidi, F. (2024). Saudi women empowerment in leadership positions in health care sector: Barriers to their success. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 9(4), e03828. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i4.3828

Karnavat, B., Rathod, C., Patel, C., & Patel, C. (2024). A study on women empowerment through entrepreneurship development program in Gujarat. ITM Web of Conferences, 65, 05001. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20246505001

Lee, C., & Huruta, A. (2022). Green microfinance and women’s empowerment: Why does financial literacy matter? Sustainability, 14(5), 3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053130

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mirayanti, M. (2022). Social enterprise dalam meningkatkan peran pemberdayaan perempuan untuk ekonomi rumah tangga dan lingkungan sosial. Jurnal Cendekia Mengabdi Berinovasi Dan Berkarya, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.56630/jenaka.v1i1.225

Mohanty, J., Joseph, V., Rout, B., & Dhami, A. (2024). Transformative change for women farmers in Sambalpur: ORMAS’s role in enhancing socio-economic empowerment. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 13(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.70112/arss-2024.13.2.4280

Muluneh, M., Francis, L., Ayele, M., Abebe, S., Makonnen, M., & Stulz, V. (2021). The effect of women’s empowerment in the utilisation of family planning in western Ethiopia: A structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126550

Oliveira, E., Basini, S., & Cooney, T. (2024). Framing a feminist phenomenological inquiry into the lived experiences of women entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 30(11), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-07-2023-0736

Pemerintah Kabupaten Blitar. (2025). Jumlah penerima penghargaan Desa/Kelurahan Berseri - Portal Data Kabupaten Blitar. https://data.blitarkab.go.id/data/jumlah-penerima-penghargaan-desakelurahan-berseri-kzxv49nq

Singh, M., & Moody, J. (2021). Do social capital and networks facilitate community participation? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-01-2021-0022

Villamil, A., Legaspi, R., & Akoto, O. (2022). Evaluating a woman's leadership journey and impact by adapting contribution mapping and analysis tools. New Directions for Evaluation, 2022(176), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20521

Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Downloads

Published

08-07-2025

How to Cite

Krisno Wicaksono, Y., Atirotu Zahroh, L., Nabihah, T. I., Raman, A., & Zahro Al Istiqlaliyah, A. (2025). Women’s Citizenship Practices and Social Power Dynamics in Blitar Regency’s Community Development Programs. APLIKATIF: Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.59110/aplikatif.v4i3.653

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.